Overview | |
---|---|
Definition (Hover Text) | It shows the number of defects reopened against the total number of defects closed. |
Source Tools | Jira |
Graph type | Line Chart |
Filters | Priority |
Hover format on KPI |
|
Fields on Explore |
|
Business Logic | |
Calculation Formula | Defect Reopen Rate (%) = (Reopened Defects / Total Resolved Defects) × 100 |
Trend | A decreasing trend is desirable |
Maturity Levels | Defect Seepage Rate maturity is assessed by averaging data from the last 5 sprints. This helps in understanding the stability and improvement over time. M1 - >= 20% M2 - >=10-20% M3 - >=5-10% , M4 >=2-5% , M5 <2% |
Instance level thresholds | NA |
Configurations | |
Processor Fields | NA |
Mandatory fields | Status to identify Closed defects |
How to Validate KPI | |
Suggested ways of working | you can use JQL to find issues where the status transitioned from a closed or resolved state back to an active state. |
Sample JQLs | Project in ("<jira project name>") and issuetype in (Defect) and status CHANGED FROM closed TO open |
Benefits of KPI | |
How does the KPI help |
|
Best Practices | |
Insudtry-aligned best practices to bring down reopen rateHow to avoid/reduce reopening of defects | Improve Defect Triage and Root Cause Analysis |
Enhance Defect Reporting Quality - Clear steps to reproduce ,expected vs actual behavior ,logs, screenshots, and environment details | |
Enforce DoD for defect fixes | |
Link defects to existing or new test cases to avoid coverage gaps. | |
Make quality everyone’s responsibility—not just QA's. |
Content Comparison
General
Content
Integrations